The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Estimated neonatal survival of very preterm births across the care pathway: a UK cohort 2016–2020
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, April 2023
|
DOI | 10.1136/archdischild-2022-324987 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah E Seaton, Ridhi Agarwal, Elizabeth S Draper, Alan C Fenton, Jennifer J Kurinczuk, Bradley N Manktelow, Lucy K Smith |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 13 | 42% |
Australia | 2 | 6% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
India | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 55% |
Scientists | 8 | 26% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
Researcher | 1 | 20% |
Other | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 40% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,887,925
of 26,557,556 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#244
of 2,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,602
of 423,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,556 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.