↓ Skip to main content

The GenoChip: A New Tool for Genetic Anthropology

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology & Evolution, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The GenoChip: A New Tool for Genetic Anthropology
Published in
Genome Biology & Evolution, May 2013
DOI 10.1093/gbe/evt066
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eran Elhaik, Elliott Greenspan, Sean Staats, Thomas Krahn, Chris Tyler-Smith, Yali Xue, Sergio Tofanelli, Paolo Francalacci, Francesco Cucca, Luca Pagani, Li Jin, Hui Li, Theodore G. Schurr, Bennett Greenspan, R. Spencer Wells, the Genographic Consortium

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Kazakhstan 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 130 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 21%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Professor 8 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 22 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 26%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 22 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2024.
All research outputs
#3,315,248
of 26,427,317 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology & Evolution
#810
of 3,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,508
of 207,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology & Evolution
#4
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,427,317 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.