↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the UK

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
70 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Summary Twitter Facebook
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the UK
Published in
Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, April 2023
DOI 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325504
Pubmed ID
37094919
Authors

Katie Evans, Cheryl Battersby, James P Boardman, Elaine Boyle, Will Carroll, Kate Dinwiddy, Jon Dorling, Katie Gallagher, Pollyanna Hardy, Emma Johnston, Helen Mactier, Claire Marcroft, James William Harrison Webbe, Chris Gale

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2023.
All research outputs
#792,856
of 23,804,762 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#57
of 1,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,601
of 312,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,804,762 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.