↓ Skip to main content

Recurrent keratoconus: an analysis of breaks in Bowman’s layer in corneal grafts

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open Ophthalmology, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recurrent keratoconus: an analysis of breaks in Bowman’s layer in corneal grafts
Published in
BMJ Open Ophthalmology, April 2023
DOI 10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001225
Authors

Lynette K Johns, Pia Leon, Paula Cortes-Barrantes, Mehenaz Hanbazazh, David Zurakowski, Thaddeus P Dryja, Joseph B Ciolino

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#15,218,347
of 23,597,497 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Ophthalmology
#154
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,485
of 222,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Ophthalmology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,597,497 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.