The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical practice recommendations for management of lateropulsion after stroke determined by a Delphi expert panel
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Rehabilitation, April 2023
|
DOI | 10.1177/02692155231172012 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jessica Nolan, Angela Jacques, Erin Godecke, Hiroaki Abe, Suzanne Babyar, Jeannine Bergmann, Melissa Birnbaum, Shenhao Dai, Cynthia Danells, Taiza GS Edwards, Marialuisa Gandolfi, Klaus Jahn, Ryan Koter, Avril Mansfield, Junji Nakamura, Vicky Pardo, Dominic Perennou, Celine Piscicelli, David Punt, Devra Romick-Sheldon, Wim Saeys, Nicola Smania, Nathalie Vaes, Abigail L Whitt, Barbara Singer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 4 | 8% |
Japan | 4 | 8% |
Australia | 4 | 8% |
Ireland | 3 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
Canada | 2 | 4% |
United States | 2 | 4% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 27 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 41 | 82% |
Scientists | 6 | 12% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 13% |
Lecturer | 4 | 13% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Librarian | 1 | 3% |
Professor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 18 | 58% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 13% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 19 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,154,100
of 26,449,643 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rehabilitation
#87
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,014
of 420,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rehabilitation
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,449,643 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.