You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Smoking, mental illness and socioeconomic disadvantage: analysis of the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-462 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Lawrence, Jennifer Hafekost, Philip Hull, Francis Mitrou, Stephen R Zubrick |
| Abstract |
High rates of smoking and lower rates of smoking cessation are known to be associated with common mental disorders such as anxiety and depression, and with individual and community measures of socioeconomic status. It is not known to what extent mental illness and socioeconomic status might be jointly associated with smoking behaviour. We set out to examine the relationship between mental illness, measures of socioeconomic disadvantage and both current smoking and smoking cessation rates. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 25% |
| Ireland | 3 | 15% |
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 30% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 144 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 33 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 29 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 14% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 40 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2013.
All research outputs
#2,541,097
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,080
of 17,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,858
of 209,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#34
of 307 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 307 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.