You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Biological Robots: Perspectives on an Emerging Interdisciplinary Field
Soft Robotics, August 2023
Douglas Blackiston, Sam Kriegman, Josh Bongard, Michael Levin
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||68||75%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||2%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||2%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||4||15%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||2||8%|
|Student > Master||2||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||2||8%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Soft Robotics
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 395,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Soft Robotics
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.