↓ Skip to main content

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia survival in an English regional ECMO center

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Pediatric Surgery, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 149)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia survival in an English regional ECMO center
Published in
World Journal of Pediatric Surgery, April 2023
DOI 10.1136/wjps-2022-000506
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth O'Connor, Ryo Tamura, Therese Hannon, Sundeep Harigopal, Bruce Jaffray

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2023.
All research outputs
#14,740,705
of 23,685,936 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Pediatric Surgery
#29
of 149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,591
of 239,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Pediatric Surgery
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,685,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them