Report for: Neuroanatomy accounts for age-related changes in risk preferences

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Title	Neuroanatomy accounts for age-related changes in risk preferences
Published in	Nature Communications, December 2016
DOI	10.1038/ncomms13822
Pubmed ID	27959326
Authors	Michael A. Grubb, Agnieszka Tymula, Sharon Gilaie-Dotan, Paul W. Glimcher, Ifat Levy
Abstract	Many decisions involve uncertainty, or 'risk', regarding potential outcomes, and substantial empirical evidence has demonstrated that human aging is associated with diminished tolerance for risky rewards. Grey matter volume in a region of right posterior parietal cortex (rPPC) is predictive of preferences for risky rewards in young adults, with less grey matter volume indicating decreased tolerance for risk. That grey matter loss in parietal regions is a part of healthy aging suggests that diminished rPPC grey matter volume may have a role in modulating risk preferences in older adults. Here we report evidence for this hypothesis and show that age-related declines in rPPC grey matter volume better account for age-related changes in risk preferences than does age per se. These results provide a basis for understanding the neural mechanisms that mediate risky choice and a glimpse into the neurodevelopmental dynamics that impact decision-making in an aging population.

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
United States	4	16%
United Kingdom	3	12%
Australia	2	8%
Spain	2	8%
Germany	1	4%
Chile	1	4%
Unknown	12	48%

Demographic breakdown

Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	17	68%
Scientists	5	20%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)	2	8%
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)	1	4%

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
United States	1	1%
Germany	1	1%
Unknown	96	98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Ph. D. Student	25	26%
Researcher	17	17%
Student > Master	15	15%
Student > Bachelor	10	10%
Student > Doctoral Student	9	9%
Other	12	12%
Unknown	10	10%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Psychology	28	29%
Neuroscience	20	20%
Social Sciences	7	7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance	6	6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	5	5%
Other	14	14%
Unknown	18	18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 387. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2017.

All research outputs

#39,216

of 16,341,797 outputs

Outputs from Nature Communications

#535

of 31,912 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#1,825

of 392,406 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications

#76

of 2,814 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 16,341,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 31,912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 2,814 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.

Neuroanatomy accounts for age-related changes in risk preferences

About this Attention Score

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Twitter Demographics

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context