↓ Skip to main content

Application of comparative functional genomics to identify best-fit mouse models to study human cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, November 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
412 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Application of comparative functional genomics to identify best-fit mouse models to study human cancer
Published in
Nature Genetics, November 2004
DOI 10.1038/ng1481
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ju-Seog Lee, In-Sun Chu, Arsen Mikaelyan, Diego F Calvisi, Jeonghoon Heo, Janardan K Reddy, Snorri S Thorgeirsson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
France 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 175 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 25%
Researcher 47 25%
Student > Master 14 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 7%
Other 9 5%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 28 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 19%
Computer Science 6 3%
Mathematics 3 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 30 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,725,241
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#4,245
of 7,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,940
of 141,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#32
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.