You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Studies on the ascorbic acid metabolism of callitrichid monkeys by14C isotope excretion technique
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Nutrition, September 1990
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02021558 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
C. I. Flurer, G. Geyer, D. Berg, W. A. Rambeck |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Kenya | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
Researcher | 1 | 33% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2003.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#1,424
of 2,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,305
of 14,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.