You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Spinning in circles? A systematic review on the role of theory in social vulnerability, resilience and adaptation research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102672 |
| Authors |
Christian Kuhlicke, Mariana Madruga de Brito, Bartosz Bartkowski, Wouter Botzen, Canay Doğulu, Sungju Han, Paul Hudson, Ayse Nuray Karanci, Christian J. Klassert, Danny Otto, Anna Scolobig, Thais Moreno Soares, Samuel Rufat |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 12 | 12% |
| United States | 10 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 3 | 3% |
| Finland | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
| Peru | 2 | 2% |
| Philippines | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 20% |
| Unknown | 42 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 50 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 47 | 47% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 13 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 13 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 16% |
| Engineering | 9 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2023.
All research outputs
#626,517
of 24,516,705 outputs
Outputs from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#231
of 1,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,431
of 389,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,516,705 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.