↓ Skip to main content

Nebuliser systems for drug delivery in cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nebuliser systems for drug delivery in cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007639.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tracey Daniels, Nicola Mills, Paul Whitaker

Abstract

Nebuliser systems are used to deliver medications to control the symptoms and the progression of lung disease in people with cystic fibrosis. Many types of nebuliser systems are available for use with various medications; however, there has been no previous systematic review which has evaluated these systems.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 121 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 19%
Other 19 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 12%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Other 41 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 48%
Unspecified 18 14%
Psychology 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Other 27 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2013.
All research outputs
#692,024
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,167
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,387
of 146,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.