You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fetal brain tissue annotation and segmentation challenge results
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Image Analysis, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.media.2023.102833 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kelly Payette, Hongwei Bran Li, Priscille de Dumast, Roxane Licandro, Hui Ji, Md Mahfuzur Rahman Siddiquee, Daguang Xu, Andriy Myronenko, Hao Liu, Yuchen Pei, Lisheng Wang, Ying Peng, Juanying Xie, Huiquan Zhang, Guiming Dong, Hao Fu, Guotai Wang, ZunHyan Rieu, Donghyeon Kim, Hyun Gi Kim, Davood Karimi, Ali Gholipour, Helena R. Torres, Bruno Oliveira, João L. Vilaça, Yang Lin, Netanell Avisdris, Ori Ben-Zvi, Dafna Ben Bashat, Lucas Fidon, Michael Aertsen, Tom Vercauteren, Daniel Sobotka, Georg Langs, Mireia Alenyà, Maria Inmaculada Villanueva, Oscar Camara, Bella Specktor Fadida, Leo Joskowicz, Liao Weibin, Lv Yi, Li Xuesong, Moona Mazher, Abdul Qayyum, Domenec Puig, Hamza Kebiri, Zelin Zhang, Xinyi Xu, Dan Wu, Kuanlun Liao, Yixuan Wu, Jintai Chen, Yunzhi Xu, Li Zhao, Lana Vasung, Bjoern Menze, Meritxell Bach Cuadra, Andras Jakab |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 3 | 17% |
| Austria | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Portugal | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Singapore | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 44% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 26% |
| Researcher | 5 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 26% |
| Engineering | 6 | 26% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,254,092
of 24,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Medical Image Analysis
#61
of 1,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,962
of 270,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Image Analysis
#3
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.