↓ Skip to main content

Drosophila long-term memory formation involves regulation of cathepsin activity

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Drosophila long-term memory formation involves regulation of cathepsin activity
Published in
Nature, July 2004
DOI 10.1038/nature02726
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Comas, Florian Petit, Thomas Preat

Abstract

Whereas short-term memory lasts from minutes to hours, long-term memory (LTM) can last for days or even an entire lifetime. LTM generally forms after spaced repeated training sessions and involves the regulation of gene expression, thereby implicating transcription factors in the initial steps of LTM establishment. However, the direct participation of effector genes in memory formation has been rarely documented, and many of the mechanisms involved in LTM formation remain to be understood. Here we describe a Drosophila melanogaster mutant, crammer (cer), which shows a specific LTM defect. The cer gene encodes an inhibitor of a subfamily of cysteine proteinases, named cathepsins, some of which might be involved in human Alzheimer's disease. The Cer peptide was found in the mushroom bodies (MBs), the Drosophila olfactory memory centre and in glial cells around the MBs. The overexpression of cer in glial cells but not in MB neurons induces a decrease in LTM, suggesting that Cer might have a role in glia and that the concentration of the Cer peptide is critical for LTM. In wild-type flies, cer expression transiently decreases after LTM conditioning, indicating that cysteine proteinases are activated early in LTM formation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 2 1%
Japan 2 1%
China 2 1%
Unknown 137 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 25%
Student > Master 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 5%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 14 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 47%
Neuroscience 31 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 9%
Computer Science 4 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 16 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2004.
All research outputs
#15,271,909
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#84,332
of 90,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,210
of 53,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#288
of 338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.