↓ Skip to main content

FGFR1 and NTRK3 actionable alterations in “Wild-Type” gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
FGFR1 and NTRK3 actionable alterations in “Wild-Type” gastrointestinal stromal tumors
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12967-016-1075-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eileen Shi, Juliann Chmielecki, Chih-Min Tang, Kai Wang, Michael C. Heinrich, Guhyun Kang, Christopher L. Corless, David Hong, Katherine E. Fero, James D. Murphy, Paul T. Fanta, Siraj M. Ali, Martina De Siena, Adam M. Burgoyne, Sujana Movva, Lisa Madlensky, Gregory M. Heestand, Jonathan C. Trent, Razelle Kurzrock, Deborah Morosini, Jeffrey S. Ross, Olivier Harismendy, Jason K. Sicklick

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Other 9 9%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 28 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 36 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,022,149
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#208
of 4,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,485
of 426,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#4
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.