You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Specifying Transaction Control to Serialize Concurrent Program Executions
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 13 |
| Book title |
Abstract State Machines, Alloy, B, TLA, VDM, and Z
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-662-43652-3_13 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-66-243651-6, 978-3-66-243652-3, 978-3-66-243651-6, 978-3-66-243652-3
|
| Authors |
Egon Börger, Klaus-Dieter Schewe |
| Editors |
Yamine Ait Ameur, Klaus-Dieter Schewe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2017.
All research outputs
#18,493,111
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#6,015
of 8,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,610
of 227,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#103
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,129 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.