↓ Skip to main content

The False Spring of 2012, Earliest in North American Record

Overview of attention for article published in Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The False Spring of 2012, Earliest in North American Record
Published in
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/2013eo200001
Authors

T. R. Ault, G. M. Henebry, K. M. de Beurs, M. D. Schwartz, J. L. Betancourt, D. Moore

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Unknown 113 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 21%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Professor 8 7%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 14 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 30 25%
Environmental Science 28 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 21 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2020.
All research outputs
#494,396
of 19,838,842 outputs
Outputs from Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union
#63
of 2,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,881
of 170,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union
#3
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,838,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.