You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ONC201 in Combination with Paxalisib for the Treatment of H3K27-Altered Diffuse Midline Glioma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Research, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1158/0008-5472.can-23-0186 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Evangeline R. Jackson, Ryan J. Duchatel, Dilana E. Staudt, Mika L. Persson, Abdul Mannan, Sridevi Yadavilli, Sarah Parackal, Shaye Game, Wai Chin Chong, W. Samantha N. Jayasekara, Marion Le Grand, Padraic S. Kearney, Alicia M. Douglas, Izac J. Findlay, Zacary P. Germon, Holly P. McEwen, Tyrone S. Beitaki, Adjanie Patabendige, David A. Skerrett-Byrne, Brett Nixon, Nathan D. Smith, Bryan Day, Neevika Manoharan, Sumanth Nagabushan, Jordan R. Hansford, Dinisha Govender, Geoff B. McCowage, Ron Firestein, Meegan Howlett, Raelene Endersby, Nicholas G. Gottardo, Frank Alvaro, Sebastian M. Waszak, Martin R. Larsen, Yolanda Colino-Sanguino, Fatima Valdes-Mora, Andria Rakotomalala, Samuel Meignan, Eddy Pasquier, Nicolas André, Esther Hulleman, David D. Eisenstat, Nicholas A. Vitanza, Javad Nazarian, Carl Koschmann, Sabine Mueller, Jason E. Cain, Matthew D. Dun |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 15 | 19% |
| United States | 13 | 17% |
| Japan | 4 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 35 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 65% |
| Scientists | 20 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#498,537
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#278
of 19,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,914
of 388,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#18
of 317 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 317 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.