↓ Skip to main content

A global map of roadless areas and their conservation status

Overview of attention for article published in Science, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
43 news outlets
blogs
12 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
481 tweeters
facebook
18 Facebook pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
313 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
A global map of roadless areas and their conservation status
Published in
Science, December 2016
DOI 10.1126/science.aaf7166
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre L. Ibisch, Monika T. Hoffmann, Stefan Kreft, Guy Pe’er, Vassiliki Kati, Lisa Biber-Freudenberger, Dominick A. DellaSala, Mariana M. Vale, Peter R. Hobson, Nuria Selva

Abstract

Roads fragment landscapes and trigger human colonization and degradation of ecosystems, to the detriment of biodiversity and ecosystem functions. The planet's remaining large and ecologically important tracts of roadless areas sustain key refugia for biodiversity and provide globally relevant ecosystem services. Applying a 1-kilometer buffer to all roads, we present a global map of roadless areas and an assessment of their status, quality, and extent of coverage by protected areas. About 80% of Earth's terrestrial surface remains roadless, but this area is fragmented into ~600,000 patches, more than half of which are <1 square kilometer and only 7% of which are larger than 100 square kilometers. Global protection of ecologically valuable roadless areas is inadequate. International recognition and protection of roadless areas is urgently needed to halt their continued loss.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 481 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 10 3%
Unknown 283 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 22%
Researcher 68 22%
Student > Master 54 17%
Unspecified 28 9%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Other 69 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 126 40%
Environmental Science 99 32%
Unspecified 50 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 2%
Other 22 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 744. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,961
of 13,218,801 outputs
Outputs from Science
#461
of 61,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#460
of 373,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#22
of 949 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,218,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 949 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.