↓ Skip to main content

A global map of roadless areas and their conservation status

Overview of attention for article published in Science, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
38 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
487 tweeters
facebook
17 Facebook pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
A global map of roadless areas and their conservation status
Published in
Science, December 2016
DOI 10.1126/science.aaf7166
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre L. Ibisch, Monika T. Hoffmann, Stefan Kreft, Guy Pe’er, Vassiliki Kati, Lisa Biber-Freudenberger, Dominick A. DellaSala, Mariana M. Vale, Peter R. Hobson, Nuria Selva

Abstract

Roads fragment landscapes and trigger human colonization and degradation of ecosystems, to the detriment of biodiversity and ecosystem functions. The planet's remaining large and ecologically important tracts of roadless areas sustain key refugia for biodiversity and provide globally relevant ecosystem services. Applying a 1-kilometer buffer to all roads, we present a global map of roadless areas and an assessment of their status, quality, and extent of coverage by protected areas. About 80% of Earth's terrestrial surface remains roadless, but this area is fragmented into ~600,000 patches, more than half of which are <1 square kilometer and only 7% of which are larger than 100 square kilometers. Global protection of ecologically valuable roadless areas is inadequate. International recognition and protection of roadless areas is urgently needed to halt their continued loss.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 487 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Chile 2 1%
France 2 1%
Italy 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 127 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 28%
Researcher 34 23%
Student > Master 29 19%
Other 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 60 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 40%
Unspecified 11 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 9 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 705. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2017.
All research outputs
#4,640
of 8,931,907 outputs
Outputs from Science
#247
of 43,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#429
of 306,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#26
of 925 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,931,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 925 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.