↓ Skip to main content

PureCN: copy number calling and SNV classification using targeted short read sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Source Code for Biology and Medicine, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 127)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PureCN: copy number calling and SNV classification using targeted short read sequencing
Published in
Source Code for Biology and Medicine, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13029-016-0060-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus Riester, Angad P. Singh, A. Rose Brannon, Kun Yu, Catarina D. Campbell, Derek Y. Chiang, Michael P. Morrissey

Abstract

Matched sequencing of both tumor and normal tissue is routinely used to classify variants of uncertain significance (VUS) into somatic vs. germline. However, assays used in molecular diagnostics focus on known somatic alterations in cancer genes and often only sequence tumors. Therefore, an algorithm that reliably classifies variants would be helpful for retrospective exploratory analyses. Contamination of tumor samples with normal cells results in differences in expected allelic fractions of germline and somatic variants, which can be exploited to accurately infer genotypes after adjusting for local copy number. However, existing algorithms for determining tumor purity, ploidy and copy number are not designed for unmatched short read sequencing data. We describe a methodology and corresponding open source software for estimating tumor purity, copy number, loss of heterozygosity (LOH), and contamination, and for classification of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) by somatic status and clonality. This R package, PureCN, is optimized for targeted short read sequencing data, integrates well with standard somatic variant detection pipelines, and has support for matched and unmatched tumor samples. Accuracy is demonstrated on simulated data and on real whole exome sequencing data. Our algorithm provides accurate estimates of tumor purity and ploidy, even if matched normal samples are not available. This in turn allows accurate classification of SNVs. The software is provided as open source (Artistic License 2.0) R/Bioconductor package PureCN (http://bioconductor.org/packages/PureCN/).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 145 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 19%
Student > Master 15 10%
Other 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 33 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 10%
Computer Science 10 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 33 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,800,425
of 25,002,811 outputs
Outputs from Source Code for Biology and Medicine
#14
of 127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,152
of 432,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Source Code for Biology and Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,002,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them