↓ Skip to main content

The association between functional movement and overweight and obesity in British primary school children

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The association between functional movement and overweight and obesity in British primary school children
Published in
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/2052-1847-5-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J Duncan, Michelle Stanley, Sheila Leddington Wright

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between functional movement and overweight and obesity in British children. METHODS: Data were obtained from 90, 7--10 year old children (38 boys and 52 girls). Body mass (kg) and height (m) were assessed from which body mass index (BMI) was determined and children were classified as normal weight, overweight or obese according to international cut offs. Functional movement was assessed using the functional movement screen. RESULTS: Total functional movement score was significantly, negatively correlated with BMI (P = .0001). Functional movement scores were also significantly higher for normal weight children compared to obese children (P = .0001). Normal weight children performed significantly better on all individual tests within the functional movement screen compared to their obese peers (P <0.05) and significantly better than overweight children for the deep squat (P = .0001) and shoulder mobility tests (P = .04). Overweight children scored significantly better than obese in the hurdle step (P = .0001), in line lunge (P = .05), shoulder mobility (P = .04) and active straight leg raise (P = .016).Functional movement scores were not significantly different between boys and girls (P > .05) when considered as total scores. However, girls performed significantly better than boys on the hurdle step (P = .03) and straight leg raise (P = .004) but poorer than boys on the trunk stability push-up (P = .014). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights that overweight and obesity are significantly associated with poorer functional movement in children and that girls outperform boys in functional movements.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 205 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 16%
Student > Bachelor 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 51 25%
Unknown 42 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 64 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 9%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 59 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2014.
All research outputs
#3,049,094
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#120
of 679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,353
of 207,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them