Chapter title |
Statistical Approaches to Candidate Biomarker Panel Selection
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 22 |
Book title |
Modern Proteomics – Sample Preparation, Analysis and Practical Applications
|
Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-41448-5_22 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-941446-1, 978-3-31-941448-5
|
Authors |
Heidi M. Spratt, Hyunsu Ju Ph.D, Hyunsu Ju |
Editors |
Hamid Mirzaei, Martin Carrasco |
Abstract |
The statistical analysis of robust biomarker candidates is a complex process, and is involved in several key steps in the overall biomarker development pipeline (see Fig. 22.1, Chap. 19 ). Initially, data visualization (Sect. 22.1, below) is important to determine outliers and to get a feel for the nature of the data and whether there appear to be any differences among the groups being examined. From there, the data must be pre-processed (Sect. 22.2) so that outliers are handled, missing values are dealt with, and normality is assessed. Once the processed data has been cleaned and is ready for downstream analysis, hypothesis tests (Sect. 22.3) are performed, and proteins that are differentially expressed are identified. Since the number of differentially expressed proteins is usually larger than warrants further investigation (50+ proteins versus just a handful that will be considered for a biomarker panel), some sort of feature reduction (Sect. 22.4) should be performed to narrow the list of candidate biomarkers down to a more reasonable number. Once the list of proteins has been reduced to those that are likely most useful for downstream classification purposes, unsupervised or supervised learning is performed (Sects. 22.5 and 22.6, respectively). |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
Researcher | 2 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 9% |
Computer Science | 2 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Unknown | 8 | 35% |