↓ Skip to main content

Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006839.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caliandro P, La Torre G, Padua R, Giannini F, Padua L

Abstract

Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow is the second most common entrapment neuropathy after carpal tunnel syndrome. Treatment may be conservative or surgical but optimal management remains controversial. This is an update of a review first published in 2010.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 76 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 24%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Researcher 8 10%
Other 6 8%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Psychology 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 18 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2013.
All research outputs
#1,647,856
of 4,506,116 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,830
of 7,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,790
of 89,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,506,116 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 62nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.