You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Resilience to autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease in a Reelin-COLBOS heterozygous man
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41591-023-02318-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francisco Lopera, Claudia Marino, Anita S. Chandrahas, Michael O’Hare, Nelson David Villalba-Moreno, David Aguillon, Ana Baena, Justin S. Sanchez, Clara Vila-Castelar, Liliana Ramirez Gomez, Natalia Chmielewska, Gabriel M. Oliveira, Jessica Lisa Littau, Kristin Hartmann, Kyungeun Park, Susanne Krasemann, Markus Glatzel, Dorothee Schoemaker, Lucia Gonzalez-Buendia, Santiago Delgado-Tirado, Said Arevalo-Alquichire, Kahira L. Saez-Torres, Dhanesh Amarnani, Leo A. Kim, Randall C. Mazzarino, Harper Gordon, Yamile Bocanegra, Andres Villegas, Xiaowu Gai, Moiz Bootwalla, Jianling Ji, Lishuang Shen, Kenneth S. Kosik, Yi Su, Yinghua Chen, Aaron Schultz, Reisa A. Sperling, Keith Johnson, Eric M. Reiman, Diego Sepulveda-Falla, Joseph F. Arboleda-Velasquez, Yakeel T. Quiroz |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 684 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 171 | 25% |
| Colombia | 34 | 5% |
| Japan | 31 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 29 | 4% |
| Spain | 19 | 3% |
| Germany | 11 | 2% |
| France | 10 | 1% |
| Italy | 9 | 1% |
| Canada | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 51 | 7% |
| Unknown | 311 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 464 | 68% |
| Scientists | 183 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 16 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 161 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 35 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 26 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1821. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#5,192
of 24,495,755 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#83
of 8,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137
of 372,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#3
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,495,755 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 104.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.