You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Accurate delineation of individual tree crowns in tropical forests from aerial RGB imagery using Mask R‐CNN
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, May 2023
James G. C. Ball, Sebastian H. M. Hickman, Tobias D. Jackson, Xian Jing Koay, James Hirst, William Jay, Matthew Archer, Mélaine Aubry‐Kientz, Grégoire Vincent, David A. Coomes
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 134 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||83||62%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||1%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||6||21%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||7%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||6||21%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,898,480 outputs
Outputs from Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 379,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,898,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.