↓ Skip to main content

Enabling a robust scalable manufacturing process for therapeutic exosomes through oncogenic immortalization of human ESC-derived MSCs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
334 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
318 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enabling a robust scalable manufacturing process for therapeutic exosomes through oncogenic immortalization of human ESC-derived MSCs
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-9-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tian Sheng Chen, Fatih Arslan, Yijun Yin, Soon Sim Tan, Ruenn Chai Lai, Andre Boon Hwa Choo, Jayanthi Padmanabhan, Chuen Neng Lee, Dominique PV de Kleijn, Sai Kiang Lim

Abstract

Exosomes or secreted bi-lipid vesicles from human ESC-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hESC-MSCs) have been shown to reduce myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in animal models. However, as hESC-MSCs are not infinitely expansible, large scale production of these exosomes would require replenishment of hESC-MSC through derivation from hESCs and incur recurring costs for testing and validation of each new batch. Our aim was therefore to investigate if MYC immortalization of hESC-MSC would circumvent this constraint without compromising the production of therapeutically efficacious exosomes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 311 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 19%
Researcher 53 17%
Student > Master 42 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 8%
Other 14 4%
Other 55 17%
Unknown 69 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 63 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 4%
Engineering 13 4%
Other 27 8%
Unknown 93 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,062,581
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#536
of 4,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,342
of 125,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.