↓ Skip to main content

Surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation for quadriceps strengthening pre and post total knee replacement

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation for quadriceps strengthening pre and post total knee replacement
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007177.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brenda Monaghan, Brian Caulfield, Dónal P O'Mathúna

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 171 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 16%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Researcher 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 37 21%
Unknown 36 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 16%
Sports and Recreations 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 42 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,266,848
of 13,171,980 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,012
of 10,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,089
of 369,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#98
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,171,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.