↓ Skip to main content

Sleep Behaviors, Genetic Predispositions, and Risk of Esophageal Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sleep Behaviors, Genetic Predispositions, and Risk of Esophageal Cancer
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, June 2023
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoyan Wang, Ruiyi Tian, Xiaoyu Zong, Myung Sik Jeon, Jingqin Luo, Graham A. Colditz, Jean S. Wang, Konstantinos K. Tsilidis, Yo-El S. Ju, Ramaswamy Govindan, Varun Puri, Yin Cao

Abstract

Risk factors contributing to more than tenfold increase in esophageal cancer in the last 50 years remain underexplored. We aim to examine the associations of sleep behaviors with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We prospectively assessed the associations between sleep behaviors (chronotype, duration, daytime napping, daytime sleepiness, snoring, and insomnia) and EAC and ESCC risk in 393,114 participants in the UK Biobank (2006-2016). Participants with 0, 1, and ≥2 unhealthy behaviors, including sleep <6 or >9 h/day, daytime napping, and usual daytime sleepiness were classified as having a good, intermediate, and poor sleep. For EAC, we also examined interactions with polygenic risk score (PRS). Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We documented 294 incident EAC and 95 ESCC. Sleep >9 h/day (HR=2.05, 95%CI: 1.18, 3.57) and sometimes daytime napping (HR=1.36, 95%CI: 1.06, 1.75) were individually associated with increased EAC risk. Compared with individuals with good sleep, those with intermediate sleep had a 47% (HR=1.47, 95%CI: 1.13, 1.91) increased EAC risk, and those with poor sleep showed a 87% (HR=1.87, 95%CI: 1.24, 2.82) higher risk (Ptrend<0.001). The elevated risks for EAC were similar within strata of PRS (Pinteraction=0.884). Evening chronotype was associated with elevated risk of ESCC diagnosed after 2 years of enrollment (HR=2.79, 95%CI: 1.32, 5.88). Unhealthy sleep behaviors were associated with an increased risk of EAC, independent of genetic risk. Sleep behaviors may serve as modifiable factors for the prevention of EAC.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,107,984
of 24,027,644 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#378
of 4,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,894
of 262,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#4
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,027,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.