↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003807.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janet E Clarkson, Helen V Worthington, Tim OB Eden

Abstract

Treatment of cancer is increasingly more effective but is associated with short and long term side effects. Oral side effects remain a major source of illness despite the use of a variety of agents to prevent and treat them. One of these side effects is oral candidiasis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 132 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 21%
Student > Master 26 19%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 17 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Psychology 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 19 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2018.
All research outputs
#905,873
of 13,379,156 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,825
of 10,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,736
of 151,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,379,156 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.