You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High-throughput clone library analysis of the mucosa-associated microbiota reveals dysbiosis and differences between inflamed and non-inflamed regions of the intestine in inflammatory bowel disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Microbiology, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2180-11-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alan W Walker, Jeremy D Sanderson, Carol Churcher, Gareth C Parkes, Barry N Hudspith, Neil Rayment, Jonathan Brostoff, Julian Parkhill, Gordon Dougan, Liljana Petrovska |
| Abstract |
The gut microbiota is thought to play a key role in the development of the inflammatory bowel diseases Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Shifts in the composition of resident bacteria have been postulated to drive the chronic inflammation seen in both diseases (the "dysbiosis" hypothesis). We therefore specifically sought to compare the mucosa-associated microbiota from both inflamed and non-inflamed sites of the colon in CD and UC patients to that from non-IBD controls and to detect disease-specific profiles. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 29% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 604 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 582 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 110 | 18% |
| Researcher | 102 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 75 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 73 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 5% |
| Other | 88 | 15% |
| Unknown | 127 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 166 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 86 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 71 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 65 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 62 | 10% |
| Unknown | 142 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2018.
All research outputs
#2,443,128
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#155
of 3,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,849
of 198,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,544 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.