You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Extending critical race, racialization, and racism literatures to the adoption, implementation, and sustainability of data equity policies and data (dis)aggregation practices in health research
Health Services Research, May 2023
Matthew Lee, Jake Ryann C. Sumibcay, Hannah Cory, Catherine Duarte, Arrianna Marie Planey
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||19||33%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||5||9%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||2%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||1||33%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,526,614 outputs
Outputs from Health Services Research
of 2,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 370,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Services Research
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,526,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.