↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: An exploratory randomised double-blind and placebo-controlled phase 2 study of a combination of baclofen, naltrexone and sorbitol (PXT3003) in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease…

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 2,630)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
40 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: An exploratory randomised double-blind and placebo-controlled phase 2 study of a combination of baclofen, naltrexone and sorbitol (PXT3003) in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13023-016-0463-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shahram Attarian, Jean-Michel Vallat, Laurent Magy, Benoît Funalot, Pierre-Marie Gonnaud, Arnaud Lacour, Yann Péréon, Odile Dubourg, Jean Pouget, Joëlle Micallef, Jérôme Franques, Marie-Noëlle Lefebvre, Karima Ghorab, Mahmoud Al-Moussawi, Vincent Tiffreau, Marguerite Preudhomme, Armelle Magot, Laurène Leclair-Visonneau, Tanya Stojkovic, Laura Bossi, Philippe Lehert, Walter Gilbert, Viviane Bertrand, Jonas Mandel, Aude Milet, Rodolphe Hajj, Lamia Boudiaf, Catherine Scart-Grès, Serguei Nabirotchkin, Mickael Guedj, Ilya Chumakov, Daniel Cohen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 29%
Researcher 4 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 14%
Neuroscience 2 14%
Linguistics 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 310. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2016.
All research outputs
#91,545
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#6
of 2,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,614
of 393,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.