You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Enumerating a continental-scale threat: How many feral cats are in Australia?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biological Conservation, February 2017
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.11.032 |
Authors |
S. Legge, B.P. Murphy, H. McGregor, J.C.Z. Woinarski, J. Augusteyn, G. Ballard, M. Baseler, T. Buckmaster, C.R. Dickman, T. Doherty, G. Edwards, T. Eyre, B.A. Fancourt, D. Ferguson, D.M. Forsyth, W.L. Geary, M. Gentle, G. Gillespie, L. Greenwood, R. Hohnen, S. Hume, C.N. Johnson, M. Maxwell, P.J. McDonald, K. Morris, K. Moseby, T. Newsome, D. Nimmo, R. Paltridge, D. Ramsey, J. Read, A. Rendall, M. Rich, E. Ritchie, J. Rowland, J. Short, D. Stokeld, D.R. Sutherland, A.F. Wayne, L. Woodford, F. Zewe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 180 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 70 | 39% |
United States | 9 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 8 | 4% |
Curaçao | 3 | 2% |
Canada | 2 | 1% |
Spain | 2 | 1% |
Slovakia | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Other | 9 | 5% |
Unknown | 74 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 143 | 79% |
Scientists | 33 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 237 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 38 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 14% |
Student > Master | 34 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 33 | 14% |
Other | 13 | 5% |
Other | 30 | 13% |
Unknown | 55 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 67 | 28% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 26% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 5% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 9 | 4% |
Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
Other | 17 | 7% |
Unknown | 67 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1463. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,371
of 25,755,403 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#2
of 6,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138
of 427,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#1
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,755,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.