↓ Skip to main content

Health worker motivation in Africa: the role of non-financial incentives and human resource management tools

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
437 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1006 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health worker motivation in Africa: the role of non-financial incentives and human resource management tools
Published in
Human Resources for Health, August 2006
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-4-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inke Mathauer, Ingo Imhoff

Abstract

There is a serious human resource crisis in the health sector in developing countries, particularly in Africa. One of the challenges is the low motivation of health workers. Experience and the evidence suggest that any comprehensive strategy to maximize health worker motivation in a developing country context has to involve a mix of financial and non-financial incentives. This study assesses the role of non-financial incentives for motivation in two cases, in Benin and Kenya.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,006 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Uganda 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
Bahamas 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 973 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 277 28%
Researcher 104 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 9%
Student > Bachelor 87 9%
Student > Postgraduate 63 6%
Other 210 21%
Unknown 174 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 246 24%
Social Sciences 146 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 144 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 102 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 48 5%
Other 122 12%
Unknown 198 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,285,575
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#244
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,798
of 91,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.