↓ Skip to main content

Walking naturally after spinal cord injury using a brain–spine interface

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 95,190)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Walking naturally after spinal cord injury using a brain–spine interface
Published in
Nature, May 2023
DOI 10.1038/s41586-023-06094-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henri Lorach, Andrea Galvez, Valeria Spagnolo, Felix Martel, Serpil Karakas, Nadine Intering, Molywan Vat, Olivier Faivre, Cathal Harte, Salif Komi, Jimmy Ravier, Thibault Collin, Laure Coquoz, Icare Sakr, Edeny Baaklini, Sergio Daniel Hernandez-Charpak, Gregory Dumont, Rik Buschman, Nicholas Buse, Tim Denison, Ilse van Nes, Leonie Asboth, Anne Watrin, Lucas Struber, Fabien Sauter-Starace, Lilia Langar, Vincent Auboiroux, Stefano Carda, Stephan Chabardes, Tetiana Aksenova, Robin Demesmaeker, Guillaume Charvet, Jocelyne Bloch, Grégoire Courtine

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,755 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 251 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 49 20%
Unspecified 35 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 12%
Student > Master 22 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 6%
Other 46 18%
Unknown 53 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 42 17%
Neuroscience 37 15%
Engineering 32 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Other 46 18%
Unknown 57 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6653. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2023.
All research outputs
#457
of 24,496,759 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#35
of 95,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7
of 367,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#1
of 1,091 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,496,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 95,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 101.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,091 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.