You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Storage of soil carbon is not sequestration: Straightforward graphical visualization of their basic differences
European Journal of Soil Science, June 2023
Philippe C. Baveye, Jacques Berthelin, Daniel Tessier, Gilles Lemaire
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||67||71%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||4||4%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||2%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||9%|
|Student > Master||2||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||10||29%|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||2||6%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,406,441 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Soil Science
of 866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 360,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Soil Science
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,406,441 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.