You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Local provincialism of late Permian plant–arthropod associations in South Cathaysia: Evidence of arthropod-mediated damages in a Wuchiapingian assemblage of South China
Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, September 2023
Fu-Jun Ma, Die-Die Luo, Song Liu, Cheng-Wan Zhang, Qiu-Jun Wang, Bing-Xia Li, Chuan-Yuan Liu, Bai-Nian Sun, Xiao He
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||7||70%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||10%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||1||100%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||1||100%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,807,923 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asian Earth Sciences
of 646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 335,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asian Earth Sciences
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,807,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 646 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.