You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Calcium channel blockers for acute traumatic brain injury
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000565 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julia Langham, Caroline Goldfrad, Graham Teasdale, Donald Shaw, Kathy Rowan |
Abstract |
Acute traumatic brain injury is a major cause of death and disability. Calcium channel blockers (calcium antagonists) have been used in an attempt to prevent cerebral vasospasm after injury, maintain blood flow to the brain, and so prevent further damage. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 156 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 22 | 14% |
Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 13% |
Other | 14 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
Other | 32 | 20% |
Unknown | 38 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 45% |
Neuroscience | 12 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
Other | 19 | 12% |
Unknown | 43 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,094,202
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,675
of 12,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,248
of 52,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.