↓ Skip to main content

Makunaima e Macunaíma: entre a natureza e a história

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de História, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Makunaima e Macunaíma: entre a natureza e a história
Published in
Revista Brasileira de História, June 2006
DOI 10.1590/s0102-01882006000100013
Authors

Daniel Faria

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#16,104,633
of 23,900,102 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de História
#210
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,688
of 65,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de História
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,900,102 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.