↓ Skip to main content

Examining Pediatric Resuscitation Education Using Simulation and Scripted Debriefing

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Pediatrics, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Examining Pediatric Resuscitation Education Using Simulation and Scripted Debriefing
Published in
JAMA Pediatrics, June 2013
DOI 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.1389
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam Cheng, Elizabeth A. Hunt, Aaron Donoghue, Kristen Nelson-McMillan, Akira Nishisaki, Judy LeFlore, Walter Eppich, Mike Moyer, Marisa Brett-Fleegler, Monica Kleinman, JoDee Anderson, Mark Adler, Matthew Braga, Susanne Kost, Glenn Stryjewski, Steve Min, John Podraza, Joseph Lopreiato, Melinda Fiedor Hamilton, Kimberly Stone, Jennifer Reid, Jeffrey Hopkins, Jennifer Manos, Jonathan Duff, Matthew Richard, Vinay M. Nadkarni, for the EXPRESS Investigators

Abstract

Resuscitation training programs use simulation and debriefing as an educational modality with limited standardization of debriefing format and content. Our study attempted to address this issue by using a debriefing script to standardize debriefings.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 129 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 24 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 21 15%
Student > Master 13 9%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Other 55 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 64%
Unspecified 16 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Psychology 9 7%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Other 4 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2018.
All research outputs
#993,297
of 13,514,418 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Pediatrics
#1,204
of 2,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,583
of 151,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Pediatrics
#15
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,514,418 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.