↓ Skip to main content

Examining Pediatric Resuscitation Education Using Simulation and Scripted Debriefing

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Pediatrics, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
Title
Examining Pediatric Resuscitation Education Using Simulation and Scripted Debriefing
Published in
JAMA Pediatrics, June 2013
DOI 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.1389
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam Cheng, Elizabeth A. Hunt, Aaron Donoghue, Kristen Nelson-McMillan, Akira Nishisaki, Judy LeFlore, Walter Eppich, Mike Moyer, Marisa Brett-Fleegler, Monica Kleinman, JoDee Anderson, Mark Adler, Matthew Braga, Susanne Kost, Glenn Stryjewski, Steve Min, John Podraza, Joseph Lopreiato, Melinda Fiedor Hamilton, Kimberly Stone, Jennifer Reid, Jeffrey Hopkins, Jennifer Manos, Jonathan Duff, Matthew Richard, Vinay M. Nadkarni, for the EXPRESS Investigators

Abstract

Resuscitation training programs use simulation and debriefing as an educational modality with limited standardization of debriefing format and content. Our study attempted to address this issue by using a debriefing script to standardize debriefings.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 216 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 14%
Other 28 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 26 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Student > Postgraduate 17 8%
Other 68 30%
Unknown 33 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 11%
Psychology 13 6%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 <1%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 42 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,360,783
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Pediatrics
#2,049
of 3,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,195
of 194,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Pediatrics
#24
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 133.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.