↓ Skip to main content

Supporting physiotherapy learners in practice settings: a mixed methods evaluation of experiences of physiotherapy educators

Overview of attention for article published in Physiotherapy Theory & Practice, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
38 X users

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Supporting physiotherapy learners in practice settings: a mixed methods evaluation of experiences of physiotherapy educators
Published in
Physiotherapy Theory & Practice, June 2023
DOI 10.1080/09593985.2023.2219313
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah A. O’Connor, Tamsin Baird, Kirsten Jack, Ryan G. Wilkinson, Alison Chambers, Claire Hamshire

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 8 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Social Sciences 2 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Unknown 9 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,546,339
of 26,552,644 outputs
Outputs from Physiotherapy Theory & Practice
#56
of 1,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,501
of 401,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physiotherapy Theory & Practice
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,552,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.