You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measurement invariance of the center for epidemiological studies depression scale (CES-D) among chinese and dutch elderly
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-74 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Baoshan Zhang, Marjolein Fokkema, Pim Cuijpers, Juan Li, Niels Smits, Aartjan Beekman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 11% |
| Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 18 | 22% |
| Unknown | 12 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 25 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,496,019
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,095
of 2,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,938
of 111,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#12
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.