↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of dreissenid biodeposits as a potential food resource for invasive Asian carp

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of dreissenid biodeposits as a potential food resource for invasive Asian carp
Published in
US Geological Survey, December 2016
DOI 10.3391/bir.2016.5.4.10
Authors

Anderson, Karl R., Chapman, Duane C., Hayer, Cari-Ann, Karl Anderson, Duane Chapman, Cari-Ann Hayer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 33%
Student > Master 2 22%
Unspecified 2 22%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 56%
Unspecified 2 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,081,711
of 9,147,909 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#254
of 1,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,955
of 310,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#28
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,147,909 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.