You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rationale, design and organization of the delayed antibiotic prescription (DAP) trial: a randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of delayed antibiotic prescribing strategies in the non-complicated acute respiratory tract infections in general practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Primary Care, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-14-63 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mariam de la Poza Abad, Gemma Mas Dalmau, Mikel Moreno Bakedano, Ana Isabel González González, Yolanda Canellas Criado, Silvia Hernández Anadón, Rafael Rotaeche del Campo, Pere Torán Monserrat, Antonio Negrete Palma, Guillem Pera, Eulàlia Borrell Thió, Carl LLor, Paul Little, Pablo Alonso Coello, for the Delayed Antibiotic Prescription (DAP) Working Group |
| Abstract |
Respiratory tract infections are an important burden in primary care and it's known that they are usually self-limited and that antibiotics only alter its course slightly. This together with the alarming increase of bacterial resistance due to increased use of antimicrobials calls for a need to consider strategies to reduce their use. One of these strategies is the delayed prescription of antibiotics. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 17 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2022.
All research outputs
#14,600,553
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,276
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,774
of 209,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#17
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.