↓ Skip to main content

Early changes in muscle atrophy and muscle fiber type conversion after spinal cord transection and peripheral nerve transection in rats

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early changes in muscle atrophy and muscle fiber type conversion after spinal cord transection and peripheral nerve transection in rats
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-10-46
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kosaku Higashino, Tetsuya Matsuura, Katsuyoshi Suganuma, Kiminori Yukata, Toshihiko Nishisho, Natsuo Yasui

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord transection and peripheral nerve transection cause muscle atrophy and muscle fiber type conversion. It is still unknown how spinal cord transection and peripheral nerve transection each affect the differentiation of muscle fiber type conversion mechanism and muscle atrophy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the difference of muscle weight change, muscle fiber type conversion, and Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivatior-1alpha (PGC-1alpha) expression brought about by spinal cord transection and by peripheral nerve transection. METHODS: Twenty-four Wistar rats underwent surgery, the control rats underwent a laminectomy; the spinal cord injury group underwent a spinal cord transection; the denervation group underwent a sciatic nerve transection. The rats were harvested of the soleus muscle and the TA muscle at 0 week, 1 week and 2 weeks after surgery. Histological examination was assessed using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunofluorescent staing. Western blot was performed with 3 groups. RESULTS: Both sciatic nerve transection and spinal cord transection caused muscle atrophy with the effect being more severe after sciatic nerve transection. Spinal cord transection caused a reduction in the expression of both sMHC protein and PGC-1alpha protein in the soleus muscle. On the other hand, sciatic nerve transection produced an increase in expression of sMHC protein and PGC-1alpha protein in the soleus muscle. The results of the expression of PGC-1alpha were expected in other words muscle atrophy after sciatic nerve transection is less than after spinal cord transection, however muscle atrophy after sciatic nerve transection was more severe than after spinal cord transection. CONCLUSION: In the conclusion, spinal cord transection diminished the expression of sMHC protein and PGC-1alpha protein in the soleus muscle. On the other hand, sciatic nerve transection enhanced the expression of sMHC protein and PGC-1alpha protein in the soleus muscle.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Japan 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Iceland 1 2%
Unknown 59 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 13%
Neuroscience 7 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Engineering 5 8%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 18 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2024.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#811
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,342
of 208,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.