↓ Skip to main content

Determinants of vulnerability in early childhood development in Ireland: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determinants of vulnerability in early childhood development in Ireland: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMJ Open, May 2013
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002387
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margaret Curtin, Jamie Madden, Anthony Staines, Ivan J Perry

Abstract

Early childhood development strongly influences lifelong health. The Early Development Instrument (EDI) is a well-validated population-level measure of five developmental domains (physical health and well-being, social competence, emotional maturity, language and cognitive skills, and communication skills and general knowledge) at school entry age. The aim of this study was to explore the potential of EDI as an indicator of early development in Ireland.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 28%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 22%
Psychology 10 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Design 1 2%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 12 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2016.
All research outputs
#3,081,380
of 15,922,193 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#5,681
of 14,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,178
of 158,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#62
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,922,193 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.