| Title |
Culture-Level Dimensions of Social Axioms and Their Correlates across 41 Cultures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0022022104268388 |
| Authors |
Michael Harris Bond, Kwok Leung, Al Au, Kwok-Kit Tong, Sharon Reimel de Carrasquel, Fumio Murakami, Susumu Yamaguchi, Günter Bierbrauer, Theodore M. Singelis, Markus Broer, Filip Boen, Sophie M. Lambert, Maria Cristina Ferreira, Kimberly A. Noels, Jay van Bavel, Saba Safdar, Jianxin Zhang, Lina Chen, Iva Solcova, Iva Stetovska, Toomas Niit, Kaisa-Kitri Niit, Helena Hurme, Mia Böling, Vijé Franchi, Guguli Magradze, Nino Javakhishvili, Klaus Boehnke, Edgar Klinger, Xu Huang, Marta Fulop, Mihaly Berkics, Penny Panagiotopoulou, Sujata Sriram, Nandita Chaudhary, Anjali Ghosh, Neharika Vohra, Dien Fakhri Iqbal, Jenny Kurman, Ram David Thein, Anna Laura Comunian, Son, Kyung Ae, Ivars Austers, Charles Harb, Joseph O. T. Odusanya, Zainal A. Ahmed, Rosnah Ismail, Fons van deVijver, Colleen Ward, Andrew Mogaji, David Lackland Sam, Muhammad Jahan Zeb Khan, William E. Cabanillas, Ly Sycip, Félix Neto, Rosa Cabecinhas, Paulo Xavier, Margareta Dinca, Nadezhda Lebedeva, Andrianna Viskochil, Oksana Ponomareva, Steven Michael Burgess, Luis Oceja, Silvia Campo, Kwang-Kuo Hwang, June Bernadette D’souza, Bilge Ataca, Adrian Furnham, J. Rees Lewis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 2% |
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 3% |
| Unknown | 368 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 96 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 16% |
| Researcher | 50 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 33 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 8% |
| Other | 76 | 19% |
| Unknown | 49 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 141 | 35% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 77 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 63 | 16% |
| Arts and Humanities | 12 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 10% |
| Unknown | 61 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2021.
All research outputs
#8,577,479
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
#382
of 904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,197
of 333,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.