↓ Skip to main content

ESICM guidelines on acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, phenotyping and respiratory support strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 5,739)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1323 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
284 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
470 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ESICM guidelines on acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, phenotyping and respiratory support strategies
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, June 2023
DOI 10.1007/s00134-023-07050-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giacomo Grasselli, Carolyn S. Calfee, Luigi Camporota, Daniele Poole, Marcelo B. P. Amato, Massimo Antonelli, Yaseen M. Arabi, Francesca Baroncelli, Jeremy R. Beitler, Giacomo Bellani, Geoff Bellingan, Bronagh Blackwood, Lieuwe D. J. Bos, Laurent Brochard, Daniel Brodie, Karen E. A. Burns, Alain Combes, Sonia D’Arrigo, Daniel De Backer, Alexandre Demoule, Sharon Einav, Eddy Fan, Niall D. Ferguson, Jean-Pierre Frat, Luciano Gattinoni, Claude Guérin, Margaret S. Herridge, Carol Hodgson, Catherine L. Hough, Samir Jaber, Nicole P. Juffermans, Christian Karagiannidis, Jozef Kesecioglu, Arthur Kwizera, John G. Laffey, Jordi Mancebo, Michael A. Matthay, Daniel F. McAuley, Alain Mercat, Nuala J. Meyer, Marc Moss, Laveena Munshi, Sheila N. Myatra, Michelle Ng Gong, Laurent Papazian, Bhakti K. Patel, Mariangela Pellegrini, Anders Perner, Antonio Pesenti, Lise Piquilloud, Haibo Qiu, Marco V. Ranieri, Elisabeth Riviello, Arthur S. Slutsky, Renee D. Stapleton, Charlotte Summers, Taylor B. Thompson, Carmen S. Valente Barbas, Jesús Villar, Lorraine B. Ware, Björn Weiss, Fernando G. Zampieri, Elie Azoulay, Maurizio Cecconi

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,323 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 470 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 470 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 46 10%
Researcher 39 8%
Student > Master 28 6%
Student > Postgraduate 26 6%
Student > Bachelor 25 5%
Other 94 20%
Unknown 212 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 181 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 5%
Unspecified 20 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 1%
Other 25 5%
Unknown 210 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 784. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2024.
All research outputs
#26,498
of 26,746,748 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#12
of 5,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#728
of 384,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#1
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,746,748 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.