↓ Skip to main content

Planning and process evaluation of a multi-faceted influenza vaccination implementation strategy for health care workers in acute health care settings

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Planning and process evaluation of a multi-faceted influenza vaccination implementation strategy for health care workers in acute health care settings
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-13-235
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josien Riphagen-Dalhuisen, Gerard Frijstein, Nannet van der Geest-Blankert, Marita Danhof-Pont, Herbert de Jager, Nita Bos, Ed Smeets, Marjan de Vries, Pieter Gallee, Eelko Hak

Abstract

Influenza transmitted by health care workers (HCWs) is a potential threat to frail patients in acute health care settings. Therefore, immunizing HCWs against influenza should receive high priority. Despite recommendations of the World Health Organization, vaccine coverage of HCWs remains low in all European countries. This study explores the use of intervention strategies and methods to improve influenza vaccination rates among HCWs in an acute care setting.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 80 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 19 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 36%
Psychology 10 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 22 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,577,464
of 12,373,180 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1,277
of 4,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,900
of 146,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,592 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.